Portrait of a Trump Supporter - The Millions
Luster - Frony's son and Dilsey's grandson. Luster is a young boy who looks after and entertains Benjy in , despite the fact that he is only half Benjy's age. April 8, , told through the eyes of Dilsey Gibson, the .. section, is a series of questions about the title, purpose, . which might be helpful in analyzing the relationship between in front of him as his life passes before his mind's eye. Everything you ever wanted to know about Dilsey in The Sound and the Fury, Topics; Character Roles (Protagonist, Antagonist. Her timeline may be largely religious (she's looking forward to redemption, not to death), but it's a timeline.
Work like hell all day every day, send them your money and get a little piece of paper back, Your account closed at I dont want a killing; only these small town gamblers are out for that, I just want my money back that these damn jews have gotten with all their guaranteed inside dope. Not many of us left. Vardaman led a grassroots populist movement by railing against this system.
Speaking in front of massive crowds, he castigated political elites, presented himself as a champion of the working man, and openly encouraged racial hostility.
Though originally from a wealthier family himself, Jason certainly sympathizes with the sense of white grievance that Vardaman and later populist politicians like Theodore Bilbo stoked. Vardaman argued that educating African-Americans would only make them more threatening, and he enthusiastically supported lynchings. Whereas the dissolution of the plantation system leads to increased economic uncertainty for Southern white families like the Compsons, here in the 21st century we are dealing with the consequences of an increasingly globalized economy, wherein manufacturing jobs do not lead to the secure careers and regular paychecks they once did.
Even as the rise of the digital economy creates new employment opportunities in the U. Jason is right to sense that his financial prospects are bleak, but he is absolutely unwilling to reflect on the history of racial oppression and violence that made his family wealthy in the first place. Similarly, in our current political moment, wealth inequality and the gutting of factory jobs are serious issues with far-reaching consequences for a variety of demographic groups.
With his comments about building walls and banning Muslims, Trump offers false solutions to real problems; he capitalizes on legitimate economic anxieties by scapegoating racial minorities, and his own vote tallies rise in direct proportion to the sense of irrational fear he cultivates in his supporters. In political moments like this one, it makes sense to turn and return to literary works, records of our shared history and repositories of long-standing cultural attitudes.
Like Faulkner before her, Rankine vividly illuminates the experience of those who struggle to reconcile their own personal difficulties with their deeply ingrained commitment to the shibboleth of white supremacy. Even as Trump puts forth a frighteningly distorted view of the world, the pain of those enticed by this worldview remains real. The Millions' future depends on your support. The concept of racial hierarchy is at odds with the domestic intimacy in which blacks and whites lived together in the South.
During the Civil War, Judith, Clytie, and Rosa live together as sisters, eating the same food, working side by side.
But when Rosa returns to the house inshe warns Clytie not to touch her: How does the novel expose the mental convolutions by which people tried to maintain the notion of an essential difference—a species difference—between black skin and white, even among members of the same family?
Many critics have commented that Faulkner takes his stylistic eccentricity to its most involuted and exaggerated extremes in Absalom, Absalom! Are there aesthetic and intellectual reasons he takes his rhetoric and syntax to such exhaustive lengths, or do you feel that his style is too self-indulgent? More importantly, it is about the doubtful process of coming to know, reconstruct, and come to grips with history. Why does Quentin, who is unrelated to Sutpen, seem to understand the tale as bearing directly upon his own identity and fate?
Compson calls it, why does it command so much mesmerized attention in this novel? Compson to make the connection clear.
Aristotle noted that a certain blindness, a character flaw he called hamartia, was common to tragic heroes. Whatare the flaws in Sutpen that contribute to his tragedy? If Sutpen is a character who stands for pure, unswerving will, what role does fate play in the story? Why does this reconstruction of a uniquely Southern tale take place on Yankee soil? What is the meaning of the relationship between story and setting, as contained in the following phrase: He seems unable to emerge from this experience into ordinary life.
Why does the past have such hallucinatory power for Quentin?
The Sound and the Fury | William Faulkner Re-read | Page 7
What does his meeting with Henry mean to him? Why then does this history seem to be a nightmare from which Quentin is unable to awaken? In all three of these novels the family is central to structure, plot, and meaning. It is the source of grief and identity as well as the locus of all individual psychic struggles. How do the families differ in each of these novels, and how are they similar? How do the particularly important symbolic roles of the mother and the father differ from book to book?
Faulkner tries to make himself disappear in these works. Instead of using the traditional third-person narrator that most readers associate with the author, he directs a chorus of voices that intertwine, complement, and contradict one another.
As readers, we must rely on what we learn from the characters themselves as to time, place, plot, and matters of cause and effect. How does this technique affect your ability to believe in the worlds that exist in these novels?
How would more direct intervention by an authorial voice change your experience? In which do you feel that his stylistic quirks are most annoying, most distracting? All of these novels question our assumptions about time as regular, linear, sequential, predictable.
Portrait of a Trump Supporter
What are some of the ways in which time is disrupted in these works? Does Faulkner want readers of Absalom, Absalom! Do you see a seamless characterization of Quentin and Mr. Compson in the two books? Faulkner is interested in the causes and effects of extreme psychological pressures, as we see in Quentin and Benjy Compson, Henry and Thomas Sutpen, Rosa Coldfield, Vardaman and Darl Bundren, and many other characters in these novels.
Faulkner has often been accused of an extremely misogynistic representation of women. Valery Bon, and other female characters in these three novels. Is the work of Faulkner necessarily different in its impact depending upon whether one is from the North or the South, whether one is black or white? In the family moved to the university town of Oxford, Mississippi, where Faulkner was to spend most of his life.
Never a brilliant student, Faulkner left high school after the tenth grade. He tried to enlist in the U.