A Matter of Trust: The Role of Communities in Energy Decision-Making - Energy Regulation Quarterly
A Matter of Trust: The Role of Communities in Energy Decision-Making The project aimed to develop a better understanding of the relationship between local . The project aims to: develop a better understanding of the relationship between local communities and public authorities in energy. It's also important to keep in mind that in a healthy relationship, you can trust that no matter what comes up your partner won't react in a way that threatens your.
Again, learning these things in a relationship happens gradually, as you both show that you are consistent with your actions not just occasionally, but all the time. Another way a person shows they are trustworthy is when their words and behavior match up.
When you love someone, you do not abuse them.The Power of LOVE💗 - One of the most Motivational Talks Ever (very emotional!)
If you trust someone, you trust them regardless of who they spend time with or where they go. My Trust Was Broken in the Past. How Can I Trust Again? Being hurt by someone in the past may have affected your ability to trust yourself and your own instincts. Are you dealing with trust issues? Our advocates are here to help. In MarchOakville passed an interim control bylaw to suspend progress while also engaging in substantive opposition activities based on environmental concerns.
In Octoberthe Ontario government cancelled the plant and engaged in negotiations and planning with TransCanada for an alternate location in Napanee, where the plant will be operational in As Oakville had done, the municipality passed an interim control bylaw in January Lawsuits and other administrative procedures were unsuccessful; the plant was built and began generating power in March Both cases were characterized by significant concerns with political interference and lack of regulatory independence.
These actions occurred both during and after the procurement processes. Similar concerns were expressed about the cancellation of the Oakville plant, and regulations to exempt the King Plant from environmental regulations, or municipal laws. Over 65 per cent of residents expressed concerns for regulatory independence from government or industry. Many stakeholders complained that no comprehensive process existed to integrate concerns for safety, need, economics, environmental impacts, and community qualities.
Many aspects of the siting process minimized certain kind of impacts, or did not allow them to be considered. These kinds of concerns were the basis for opposition for over 60 per cent of the residents who were opposed. Over 70 per cent of all respondents were concerned about local environmental impacts.
The competitive procurement process created a dynamic in which potential participants were forced to pay attention to multiple possible sites and developers, making it quite difficult to devote appropriate resources to the siting process.
Residents also complained that consultation did not occur, and that communication was one-sided. Over 50 per cent of residents were concerned about the lack of opportunity to influence the process, especially early on.
Residents complained extensively about the difficulty of getting detailed information from the regulators and developers. Forty per cent of residents had concerns for the lack of information availability.
The project was to be situated in the southern part of the province, 50 kilometres from Montreal, providing a total capacity of The main economic activity in the municipality and surrounding region is agriculture. It is a popular boat access point to the United States. The BAPE recommended the project be rejected and the provincial government did so in Julybased on the judgment that it fundamentally lacked the social acceptance necessary for sustainable development.
Both factors eroded the perceived legitimacy of the sector.
The project was proposed during the development phase of the wind energy sector. The consultation and decision processes: Were not adapted to the regional scope and impact of the project, i. Furthermore, consultation and negotiation were too restrictive to allow for modification of the project from a citizen perspective. The opposition was well-organized, with regional, provincial and international expertise and experience.
REPORT | A Matter of Trust: The role of communities in energy decision-making
The BAPE public hearings created conditions favourable to the opponents. The estimated impact on the landscape made the project incompatible with the agricultural nature of the area and country living.
The project was very close to the Richelieu River with its rich biodiversity. The presence of a number of prosperous local farmers and retired professionals at the hearings reinforced this effect. This area, chosen for the case study, features a mix of coastal and inland villages, forested areas and the Elsipogtog Nation reserve community, which makes up approximately a tenth of the 30, residents in Kent County.
The context of Kent County includes a history of expropriation, low literacy rates and a unique blend of Acadian, Anglo and Elsipogtog Nation cultures. Persistent protests and blockades of exploration activity occurred throughout the summer of in Kent County, culminating in violent clashes in the fall of After exploration licences were issued inpublic protests in different exploration areas across New Brunswick, including Kent County, caught regulators Departments of Energy and Mines, and of the Environment and Local Government flat-footed.
The province introduced a series of rules in and again in to address water contamination concerns, but public opposition remained high. A new provincial government elected in October carried out its promise to place a moratorium on hydraulic fracturing in December The new government appointed a commission to hold hearings across the province throughout to find out more about the root issues underlying public concern.
The commission issued its report in early and in May the government extended the moratorium indefinitely.
Interviews and survey questions revealed high levels of opposition to hydraulic fracturing for shale gas 70 per cent opposed or somewhat opposed and that water contamination concerns were the most important issue for community members. Opposition levels reached 80 per cent for Indigenous residents. For some involved in the industry and in the business community, the fact that shale gas extraction, including hydraulic fracturing, had taken place in the southern Sussex region of the province without incident meant that risks were known and manageable and offered economic development benefits.
Interviews and survey questions revealed a general lack of confidence in the ability of regulators to oversee a relatively new technology like hydraulic fracturing to extract shale gas. A majority 59 per cent express low confidence in the capacity of regulator to enforce rules. Some also saw a problematic dual role played by the Department of Mines and Energy as both a proponent and regulator of the shale gas industry.
Public trust in authorities was eroded as prominent public authority figures were forced to resign in scandal or were perceived to have been fired for criticism of shale gas development.
Two-thirds of Kent County residents reported an increase in their level of confidence in public authorities responsible for shale gas regulation as a result of the moratorium decision.
In the final analysis, publicly elected representatives decided the shale gas energy resources could not be developed in a way that would garner social acceptance.
Conclusions and recommendations In this section, we bring together our observations and conclusions from both the interim report and from the case studies. The majority of arguments and conflicts are, at their core, about trust. Trust is absolutely essential to build safety in a relationship new or old. It is only from this knowing that you are being cared for as much as you are caring for, and being loved and appreciated as much as your are loving and appreciating, that you can withstand the risks, doubts, and conflicts that inevitably arise in partnerships.
Build your trust metric: Trust is something to care take and to cultivate. It is an aspect of the relationship that needs continual attention. Really hear them when they are sad, angry, disappointed, etc. Listen with curiosity and openness and respond from this place, rather than from defensiveness or a desire to dismiss. In fact, with adequate connection and empathy, conflict can be constructive in leading to creative problem solving. Let your partner know that you are going to be there, even when they are upset with you.
Turn the screens off and make time to listen and be with your partner with your whole heart and attention. Good relationships require trust and commitment. Commitment is absolutely necessary for building safety in a relationship. Couples that do not build this kind of investment in their relationship, or who make negative comparisons to other relationships, end up betraying the relationship.
In fact, this alone is a predictor of infidelity.
Relationships: Time, Trust and Tango | HuffPost Life
Check in with yourself frequently and ask yourself if you are thinking that the grass might be greener with someone else, or if you are starting to meet needs outside of the relationship through others. Remember- commitment is about loving THIS person- all the good and the bad.
Choose gratitude instead of resentment.