Positive reinforcement and relationship based training

positive reinforcement and relationship based training

Dog training based upon rewards versus punitive discipline not only produces different rates of Low Sexual Desire · Relationships · Sex . dicipline based dog training punishment negative reinforcement . and classical conditioning have caused everything associated with their training to produce positive feelings . New research supports the idea that positive reinforcement is best for both Many people are concerned that aversive-based dog training. When training a dog, Best Friends Animal Society uses relationship-based methods. Get advice Use positive reinforcement to encourage behavior you want.

Through clear and easy methods, The Peaceful Dog educates dog parents on how dogs learn, and on how parents can use this knowledge to elicit the behaviors they want. A well-trained dog is a companion that can offer a lifetime of fun, love, and adventure. The Science Behind It All Scientific research has played an important role in animal behavior modification by providing humans with important insights into how an animals mind develops and learns.

She has used her scientific knowledge to develop training methods that will help your dog learn to modify their behavior as quickly as possible. Learning Theory provides the foundation for science-based dog training.

There are four ways that a behavior can be modified according to operant conditioning: By presenting your dog with something they love for performing a behavior, you will likely increase the frequency of that behavior. Conversely, removing a desirable reward for any behavior will likely decrease the frequency of that behavior.

Every night at mealtime your dog jumps on you and barks while you put down his food bowl. You put down the bowl while he is jumping and barking.

One participant reported they acquired dominance training and eight participants reported they acquired positive-reinforcement. Parents Categorize Their Trainer.

Fisher tests were conducted to determine whether or not parents can identify the type of trainer they worked with. The minimum expected count is.

Behavioral Minute: Positive Reinforcement and Relationships

Computed only for a 2x2 table. One participant reported to have acquired a positive-reinforcement trainer and reported that they indeed used positive- reinforcement tools and terms. Seven participants who reported to have acquired positive- reinforcement trainer did not use positive-reinforcement tools or terms; this means they categorized their trainer incorrectly.

positive reinforcement and relationship based training

One participant reported they acquired a alpha trainer. They categorized them correctly because they used dominance-based tools and terms. Participants chose from a checklist what tools they used during the training sessions.

Dog Training Education: Dominance-based v.s. Positive-reinforcement | Alexa Alonzo - kinenbicounter.info

The participant who acquired alpha-based training used a nylon collar as well as a spike or prong collar. Participants were asked to check off what term s their trainer used to describe their role in the training process.

Participants were asked to check off what term s their trainer used as a part of the training process. Participants were also asked to report whether their dog trainer informed them of their training philosophy. The parent who acquired alpha-based training reported their dog trainer did Running Head: Seven of the eight parents who acquired a positive- reinforcement trainer reported their dog trainer informed them about their training philosophy, while one said their trainer did not inform them.

Parents were asked to rate whether their trainer gave any tips or recommendations. All of the parents reported that their trainer encouraged them to practice training techniques daily, to incorporate exercise as a part of the training process, and to reward their dog for any good or wanted behavior.

Fisher tests were also conducted to determine whether or not pet parents preferred one type of training over the other. Value df 2-sided Pearson Chi- 2. Last but not least, participants were asked a series of questions about their post-training experience. Participants were asked to report their ability to handle their dog.

The parent who acquired an alpha-based trainer reported he was able to handle his dog.

positive reinforcement and relationship based training

Out of the eight parents Running Head: DOG TRAINING 15 who acquired a positive-based trainer, four reported they were very able; two reported they were somewhat able to; two reported they were neutral about their ability to handle their dog. Out of the eight parents who acquired a positive-based trainer, four reported they were very confident; four reported they were somewhat confident. Trainer Recommendation from Parents. Finally, participants were asked to rate whether or not they would recommend their dog trainer to other people.

When positive-based participants were asked the same question, five participants reported they were very likely to recommend their dog trainer; one participant reported they were likely to recommend their trainer; one participant reported they were neutral about recommending their trainer; one participant reported they were not at all likely to recommend their dog trainer to others.

Some people do not even know they exist.

Training Philosophy | The Peaceful Dog

Here are the possible explanations as to why people Running Head: Dog parents chose from a checklist what tools they used during their training sessions. One parent who claimed they did not know how to categorize their trainer also stated they used an electric shock collar as a part of the training process. This could mean a number of things: Since electric shock collars are widely recommended and sold frequently, parents automatically draw to them to quickly solve their dog's problems.

What parent's need to know is that these collars lack correct timing, intensity and duration Polsky, This means at one point or another point they will have to identify the real problem in order to figure out a solution to teach their dog polite behavior s. The parent who categorized their trainer as an alpha-based trainer also reported that they used a prong or spike collar in the training process, which proves that aversive- or compulsion- based use these tools.

They quickly and easily correct a dog's behavior, which is the route many dominant-based trainers prefer. They probably face the same issues are the parent who used an electric shock collar. The good news is the other participants used appropriate tools, but not appropriate terms. Many parents, who claimed to have acquired positive-based training, reported that their trainers used words such as "Pack leader" or "alpha" to describe their role in the training process.

Also, parents should know that their dog understands that we are a totally different species Stilwell, We should not apply such a term while learning about interspecies relationships. Positive-based trainers would have told parents that "the strongest relationship between dogs and humans are based on cooperation and kindness rather than on human dominance and animal submission" Stilwell, Submission was another word parents checked-off, when that word is actually used by compulsion or aversive-based trainers.

This supports my hypothesis that parents are uneducated about the different terms used by each trainer. Many parents also reported that their positive-based trainer encouraged them to say "No" during their sessions. It's a natural thing for us to say when something goes wrong, but it's also the wrong thing to say when practicing positive-reinforcement.

Although "No" is a word commonly used to express our dislike towards negative situations, it is common sense that dogs do not understand it. The majority of positive-based trainers did inform their clients about their methods, and yet the terms and tools they used did not match the standards for a positive-based trainer.

Lauren Camerini

Each dog breed is different and trainers should cater to that breed's needs. Although no information was collected about the breeds that were trained, this is research that should and will be done in the future.

Big breeds like the American Staffordshire terriers, also known as Pitbull Terriers, are thought of as big and bad amongst certain people. People who give them this stereotype think that since they are strong, muscular dogs, that they need a leader who show be dominant.

Pitbull parents, advocates, and trainers work hard everyday to show the general public that they are known to be the sweetest and easiest dogs to train, since one of their personality traits is to please their provider Dunbar, It is interesting to note that one survey response was totally irrelevant, yet relevant at the same time.

This survey response most likely came from a dog trainer who was curious about the purpose of this study. These training tools are only hurting the future of the entire dog-training industry. More seminars and workshops need to be given about the power of positive-reinforcement: Positive-reinforcement trainers are notorious for encouraging dog parents to never correct, scold, or force their dog to do anything. In this study, many parents reported that their positive-reinforcement trainer encouraged them to "correct" their dog.

The same way people are Running Head: This further supports my hypothesis that parents may not be correct when reporting the type of training used with their dog. It's difficult to say if this is because their dog learned or their dog was conditioned to a certain behavior. This study also did not ask about before and after behaviors, so there are no specific changes to refer back to.

Many parents reported that they would recommend their dog trainer to other parents and would also return for them for more training. A checklist with different handling techniques could have been included to clarify the methods used. While 32 dog parents signed-up to participate in the survey, ten parents could not participate because they trained their dogs themselves.

To defuse this, these parents were asked if they were willing to participate in a separate study in the future about their views on the human-canine relationship. There is no way to know if satisfaction is greater for one type of training than the other since the same percentage of parents not shown reported they were satisfied with their Running Head: One reason this may have been found is because there were different sample sizes for each type of training.

There was also no collection about when training was completed, so participants responses may or may not be considered outdated, or noted from memory. This study was designed so that parents categorize their trainer first, then identify the training components last. This means that they were not able to change their answers.

Participants were also asked if they were willing to participate in future studies or provide references. Thankfully, one person provided four references, and three of them completed the survey to increase the sample size.

This study might not be generalizable to other cities or areas, since this study was done in New York City only.