Provides persons who carry out periodic verification, by inspection and/or testing, with the means to determine, as far as reasonably practicable. AS/NZS Electrical installations – Periodic verification. standard by Australian/New Zealand Standards, 01/01/ View all product. AS/NZS This Joint Australian/New Zealand Standard was prepared by Joint Technical Committee EL, Wiring Rules. It was approved on behalf.
|Published (Last):||20 January 2012|
|PDF File Size:||9.97 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||12.69 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The Department of Building and Housing has a form for Verification of Installations disconnected for more than 6 months.
Xs existing installation on which no work has been carried out and is not subject to reg My mistake on the origin of the form i use. Is this a job for a registered electrician or is it for an inspector.
There was a time that a particular Insurer made a point of ensuring that 33019 certain Industry Organization was required, however I have noticed that in recent times this reference has been removed when they have required an Inspection. Accordingly you can use the example form, or modify it to suit yourself. Mostly because it tries to be all nas for all purposes, and fails at some of them while doing none of them well.
I accept that it is a poor form for most things but it was free and the local lines coy accept it. In a practical sense, most insurers will want an electrical tradesperson, some will want an inspector, and 30019 will want a member of a particular industry organisation.
Yes just like a warrant of fitness only good for the day of issue. Would I be liable for any damages if it was a common electrical fault? Sam Nov 04 I have just conducted testing for insurance purposes to and am about to submit my report for them, but had the thought that what if nsz was to go wrong after I have submitted my report to say it was all good.
Standards New Zealand :: Electrical installations – Periodic verification
Is it worth arguing with the lines coy and retailer that merely pulling the pole fuse does not constitute disconnection but is in fact isolation and does not trigger reg Sarmajor Oct 17 Or use the EWRB form. Doing a disconnected house tomorrow so I will use the form with a critical eye to its faults and report back. Ron Proffit at Electrical Forum Email: AlecK Nov 05 Sarmajor Oct 21 I usually write lots of notes in the boxes that are not nzzs.
You can get certification books free from the EWRB for inspections. A men system of installation and Existing Mains Work. As to iability, step 1is to have some liability insurance in place that ovrs ou fort offering any opinion as to the nsz state of 30199 installation.
You are correct that simply pullng fuse is only isolation not disconnection, and so ESR 74 is not triggered. I have just been asked 301 about this by a customer.
AlecK Oct 21 Noting that this Section 3 is a visual-only inspection, there is no requirement for any testing whatsoever. Click here to send Ron a pdf document for publication on this Topic Documents must be less than k in pdf format. If anything does go wrong, there will be highly skilled lawyers acting for insurers whose first target for recovering their payout nss whoever signed a certificate. GPower Oct 17 No copies mandated – but a copy on file may be useful.
So any comments, notes, etc should really be kept separate. Saturn Nov 05 AlecK Oct 22