We propose and evaluate an extension to the Application-Layer FEC (AL-FEC) codes introduced by the Pro-MPEG Forum in its Code of Practice 3 r2 (Pro-MPEG . Layer FEC (AL-FEC) codes introduced by the Pro-MPEG. Forum in its Code of Practice 3 r2 (Pro-MPEG COP3 codes), consisting in allowing the use of a number. [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avformat: Add Pro-MPEG CoP #3-R2 FEC protocol. Vlad Tarca vtarca at Thu Jun 2 CEST.
|Published (Last):||2 September 2011|
|PDF File Size:||12.27 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.22 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Australia views sinks as an integral part of Article 5. As stated in Q1, Australia believes adoption of the comprehensive approach for the first budget year is necessary because it. The answer is governed by the agreed position of the EU, which recognises the desirability of eventually taking into account sinks in QELROs, once the modalities for doing so can be agreed.
In this respect, Australia notes that its inventory figure for has been revised three times. The uptake resulting form such action should be quantifies using IPCC guidelines.
Subject to relevant modalities, rules and guidelines, to be decided by the first MOP, Parties that apply the methodologies referred to under Article 4 may count their enhancement of removals by sinks against their aggregate anthropogenic CO 2 equivalent emissions by sources. No, for explanation see paragraph 6.
The IPCC should be asked to provide criteria for the determination of which actions can be considered anthropogenic enhancement of sinks. There is no need to limit application of new IPCC methods to a second budget period or subsequent target. Why cop33 why not?
The IPCC guidelines should be used for the quantification of the carbon dioxide removal resulting from individual projects or actions. Historical national communications should not cpo3 used as the basis for measuring compliance.
The guidelines ask that an uncertainty assessment be conducted and summarised as far as possible for each major part of the inventory. The criteria used in Australia’s inventory to define “high” “medium” and “low” levels of confidence in the different sectors reflects the quality of ocp3 activity data generally available in that sector, and the confidence with which the relationships between activity and emissions have been established.
Zenwalk GNU Linux: April
Canada, along with many other Parties, strongly believe that future changes in the Coo3 are necessary. Australia would oppose the option of not having a cpp3 year option ‘none’ as this would not provide any means of measuring and including in QELROs improvements in sinks. See response to question 1 above. Australia believes all categories agreed to be anthropogenic should be included. See response to Q8 a. Do you have any other approach to propose? Conservation of the Hawksbill Turtle Eretmochelys imbricada.
ip cop3 r2 pdf – download now
On the other hand, countries with net losses from sinks eventually reach limits to further deforest, and as a result their emissions reach zero. The burden of proof rests with the Party. Such an approach maximises the ckp3 effectiveness of mitigation action through allowing individual countries to tailor their approach to their own emissions profile. Extension of the Secretariat Pro Tempore. If the national communications are based on the IPCC guidelines for the quantification of sink uptake, cop would be adequate for assessing compliance with a QELRO.
Key programs that have a direct impact on human action include the National Vegetation Initiative, copp3 program which includes extensive replanting of Australia’s native vegetation cover, copp3 the Vision, which aims to treble the plantation estate by If we were to eliminate some sources from an inventory, or a QELRO, solely because of the uncertainty in the emission estimates, we might also be eliminating an area in which large and measurable gains could be made in reducing emissions, or in enhancing the removal of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Conservation of Loggerhead Sea Turtle Caretta caretta. Increased emissions from land use change would be subtracted from the estimated uptake from projects aimed g2 enhancing sinks. MOP1 will be in a better position to judge adequacy, based on information from the in depth reviews of Second National Communications.
This is a larger uncertainty than usually occurs on an emissions trend. Please see paragraphs 11 and The sinks themselves are generally natural growing forest, accumulation of organic matter carbon in soils. The handling of sources d2 sinks should reflect the relative weight between these two in a country’s greenhouse profile.
The Framework Convention on Climate Change is unclear on how to treat emissions and carbon sequestration from land use t2 and forestry both in terms of a country’s national inventory and any legally binding commitment. Australia has used as its base year and has refined the data for that year as it is used in Article 4.