Russia | NATO PA
We have made it clear that we continue to seek a constructive relationship with Russia. But an improvement in the Alliance's relations with. aggression with robust support for NATO, while reassuring Russia of NATO's Columbia University, and director of the Program on U.S.-Russia Relations at. Ahead of the Nato summit in Warsaw, Paul Adams explores how the alliance's increasingly tense relationship with Russia is set to dominate proceedings.
Together with EU enlargement, it has spread stability and prosperity in Europe since the fall of the Berlin Wall. NATO enlargement has contributed to spreading democracy, security and stability further across Europe. By choosing to adopt the standards and principles of NATO, aspirant countries gave their democracies the strongest possible anchor.
NATO membership is not imposed on countries. Each sovereign country has the right to choose for itself whether it joins any treaty or alliance.
Russia–NATO relations - Wikipedia
This fundamental principle is enshrined in international agreements including the Helsinki Final Act which says that every state has the right "to belong or not to belong to international organizations, to be or not to be a party to bilateral or multilateral treaties including the right to be or not to be a party to treaties of alliance.
Not one has asked to leave. This is their sovereign choice. Article 13 of the Washington Treaty specifically gives Allies the right to leave should they wish to. All the countries of Central and Eastern Europe which have joined NATO over the past decade have enjoyed peace, security and cooperation with their neighbours since then. The countries in the region which aspire to membership are conducting reforms to bring themselves closer to NATO standards.
These reforms enhance democracy and security in each country. The countries in the region have played a significant role in NATO's operations in Afghanistan and Kosovo, providing training to the Afghan forces and helping to provide a safe and secure environment for all people in Kosovo. This is a direct contribution to stability in the broader Euro-Atlantic area. When the administrations of President Kuchma and President Yushchenko made clear their aspiration to NATO membership, the Alliance worked with them to encourage the reforms which would be needed to make that aspiration a reality.
When the administration of President Yanukovych opted for a non-bloc status, NATO respected that decision and continued to work with Ukraine on reforms, at the government's request. NATO respects the right of every country to choose its own security arrangements.
In fact, Article 13 of the Washington Treaty specifically gives Allies the right to leave. Over the past 65 years, 29 countries have chosen freely, and in accordance with their domestic democratic processes, to join NATO. According to Article I of the Helsinki Final Act here which established the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe OSCE inevery country has the right "to belong or not to belong to international organizations, to be or not to be a party to bilateral or multilateral treaties including the right to be or not to be a party to treaties of alliance.
In line with those principles, Ukraine has the right to choose for itself whether it joins any treaty of alliance, including NATO's founding treaty. Moreover, when Russia signed the Founding Act, it pledged to uphold "respect for sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity of all states and their inherent right to choose the means to ensure their own security".
Thus Ukraine has the right to choose its own alliances, and Russia has, by its own repeated agreement, no right to dictate that choice. The demonstrations which began in Kiev in November were born out of Ukrainians' desire for a closer relationship with the European Union, and their frustration when former President Yanukovych halted progress toward that goal as a result of Russian pressure.
The protesters' demands included constitutional reform, a stronger role for the parliament, the formation of a government of national unity, an end to the pervasive and endemic corruption, early presidential elections and an end to violence. There was no mention of NATO. Ukraine began discussing the idea of abandoning its non-bloc status in Septembersix months after the illegal and illegitimate Russian "annexation" of Crimea and the start of Russia's aggressive actions in Eastern Ukraine.
The final decision by Ukraine's Verkhovna Rada to abandon the non bloc status was taken in Decemberover a year after the pro-EU demonstrations began. The idea has never been proposed, suggested or discussed within NATO.
NATO agreed at the Wales Summit to offer Georgia a substantial package of assistance to strengthen Georgia's defence and interoperability capabilities with the Alliance. This is a training centre, not a military base. It contributes to stability by making Georgia's armed forces more professional, and by reinforcing the democratic controls over them.
NATO has bases all around the world Fact: NATO's military infrastructure outside the territory of Allies is limited to those areas in which the Alliance is conducting operations. These cannot be considered as "military bases".
Individual Allies have overseas bases on the basis of bilateral agreements and the principle of host-nation consent, in contrast with Russian bases on the territory of Moldova TransnistriaUkraine the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Georgia the regions of Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Every nation has the right to conduct exercises, but it is important that they are conducted transparently and in line with international obligations. If an exercise exceeds 9, personnel, it is subject to notification, and if it exceeds 13, personnel, observers from OSCE states must be invited to attend the exercise.
- How do you solve a problem like Russia? NATO-Russia relations after Ukraine
- Russia–NATO relations
- NATO - Russia Relations
Since the end of the Cold War, Russia has never opened an exercise to mandatory Vienna Document observation. Both the scale and geographical scope of the exercise significantly exceeded what Russia had previously announced, including in the NATO-Russia Council. Russia has also used large snap exercises, including with tens of thousands of troops, to intimidate its neighbours.
This practice raises tension and undermines trust. Russia's intervention in Georgia in and illegal annexation of Crimea in were masked by snap exercises. NATO is encircling Russia.
Nato and Russia's tense relationship
This myth ignores geography. Russia's land border is just over 20, kilometres long. Of that, less than one-sixteenth 1, kilometresis shared with NATO members. Russia has land borders with 14 countries.
Only five of them are NATO members. In contrast, Russia has military bases and soldiers in three countries — Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine — without the consent of their governments.
The Cold War ended over 20 years ago. It was characterized by the opposition of two ideological blocs, the presence of massive standing armies in Europe, and the military, political and economic domination by the Soviet Union of almost all its European neighbours.
The end of the Cold War was a victory for the people of Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union, and opened the way to overcoming the division of Europe.
Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has introduced sweeping changes to its membership and working practices — changes made clear by its adoption of new Strategic Concepts in and No other country has such a privileged relationship with NATO. But we cannot and will not compromise on the principles on which our Alliance and security in Europe and North America rest.
NATO-Russia relations: the facts
This is NATO's official policy, defined and expressed transparently by its highest level of leadership. As an organisation which is accountable to its member nations, NATO is bound to implement this policy. NATO is a U. NATO was founded in by twelve sovereign nations: It has since grown to 29 Allies who each took an individual and sovereign decision to join this Alliance. All decisions in NATO are taken by consensus, which means that a decision can only be taken if every single Ally accepts it.
Equally, the decision for any country to take part in NATO-led operations falls to that country alone, according to its own legal procedures. No member of the Alliance can decide on the deployment of any other Ally's forces. This states that Allies are determined "to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area.
They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence and for the preservation of peace and security. The Alliance has conducted exercises from the Mediterranean to the North Atlantic and across Europe, and on issues ranging from counter-terrorism to submarine rescue - including with Russia itself.
None of these activities can credibly be presented as directed against Russia.
For more than two decades, NATO has consistently worked to build a cooperative relationship with Russia. We set out to build a good relationship with Russia. We worked together on issues ranging from counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism to submarine rescue and civil emergency planning. We do not seek confrontation, but we cannot ignore Russia breaking international rules, undermining our stability and security.
At the London Summit inAllied heads of state and government agreed that ""We need to keep standing together, to extend the long peace we have enjoyed these past four decades".
This was their sovereign choice and was fully in line with their right to collective defence under the United Nations Charter. Since then, thirteen more countries have chosen to join NATO.
The Alliance has taken on new missions and adapted to new challenges, all the while sticking to its fundamental principles of security, collective defence, and decision-making by consensus. Thus, rather than being disbanded, NATO adapted, and continues to change, to live up to the needs and expectations of Allies, and to promote their shared vision of a Europe whole, free and at peace.
The incorporation of the countries of Central and Eastern Europe into the Soviet Union and the Warsaw Pact after the Second World War was carried out under conditions of military occupation, one-party dictatorship and the violent suppression of dissent.
When the countries of Central and Eastern Europe applied for NATO membership after the dissolution of the Warsaw Pact, it was of their own free choice, through their own national democratic processes, and after conducting the required reforms. This was done through debate, in peacetime conditions, and in a transparent way. NATO as a "threat" Claim: NATO is a defensive alliance, whose purpose is to protect our member states.
Military mobility is key to deterrence in peacetime and key to our collective defence in times of crisis. NATO is working closely with Allies to ensure that our bridges, roads, ports and rail networks are capable of transporting military equipment and personnel across our Allies' borders. This is not a preparation for war. This is about updating the military requirements for civilian infrastructure at a time when we see increased challenges to our security, including as a result of Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea and ongoing destabilisation of eastern Ukraine.
NATO is cooperating with Allies and the European Union to remove bureaucratic hurdles to allow us to move forces across Allied territory. This involves sharing information on standards, requirements, and any challenges related to civilian infrastructure. We are also working closely with national governments and the private sector to ensure that infrastructure in Allied territory remains in top condition.
NATO has taken defensive and proportionate steps in response to a changed security environment. Inthe battlegroups became fully operational. More than 4, troops from Europe and North America work closely together with home defence forces.
NATO's presence in the region is at the request of the host nations, and enjoys significant public support. A Gallup poll found that most people in Allied countries in the Baltic region associate NATO with the protection of their country. NATO forces uphold the highest standards of conduct, both on and off duty. They toured a number of military sites, including some used by the multinational NATO battlegroups. NATO's missile defence system is purely defensive and not directed against Russia.
Bilateral agreements between the US and host nations do not allow missile sites to be used for any purpose other than missile defence. The system defends against ballistic missiles from outside the Euro-Atlantic area. NATO has attempted many times to cooperate with Russia on missile defence. Russian statements threatening to target Allies because of NATO's ballistic missile defence are unacceptable and counterproductive.
Our exercises and military deployments are not directed against Russia — or any other country. We announce our military exercises well in advance and they are subject to international observation. We notify Russia throughout the year about our exercises. Infor example, Russian military experts visited 13 Allied exercises. This demonstrates the transparency of our military activities. In direct response to Russia's use of military force against its neighbours, NATO has deployed four multinational battlegroups to the Baltic States and Poland.
These forces are rotational, defensive and proportionate. They cannot compare to the three divisions Russia has established in its Western Military and Southern Military Districts.
Before Russia's illegal annexation of Crimea, there were no plans to deploy Allied troops to the eastern part of the Alliance. Our aim is to prevent conflict, protect our Allies, and preserve the peace.
NATO remains open to meaningful dialogue with Russia. Talking to Russia allows us to communicate clearly our positions. The crisis in and around Ukraine remains the first topic on our agenda. Shortly after the incident, NATO called an emergency meeting to discuss the matter.
On 2 DecemberNATO member states formally invited Montenegro to join the alliance, which drew a response from Russia that it would suspend cooperation with that country. Today's meeting did not change that. He has highlighted the importance of Article 5 in the North Atlantic Treaty and NATO's responsibility to defend the security of its eastern members in particular. He has further stated that Russia needs to be sanctioned over its actions in Ukraine, and has said that a possible NATO membership of Ukraine will be "a very important question" in the near future.
Stoltenberg has expressed concern over Russia acquiring new cruise missiles. A final strategy is expected in October In addition, 3 unfilled positions at the mission were denied accreditation from NATO. The council has been an official diplomatic tool for handling security issues and joint projects between NATO and Russia, involving "consensus-building, consultations, joint decisions and joint actions.
The heads of state for NATO Allies and Russia gave a positive assessment of NATO-Russia Council achievements in a Bucharest summit meeting in April though both sides have expressed mild discontent with the lack of actual content resulting from the council.
Russia, in turn, insisted the recognition was taken basing on the situation on the ground, and was in line with the UN Charterthe CSCE Helsinki Final Act of and other fundamental international law ;  Russian media heavily stressed the precedent of the recent Kosovo declaration of independence.
NATO - Topic: NATO-Russia relations: the facts
One cannot carry out exercises in a place where there was just a war. The Russian Space Forces commander, Colonel General Vladimir Popovkin stated in that "[the] trajectories of Iranian or North Korean missiles would hardly pass anywhere near the territory of the Czech republic, but every possible launch of Russian ICBM from the territory of the European Russiaor made by Russian Northern Fleet would be controlled by the [radar] station".
Clinton said 'Why not? When Rasmussen first met President Putin inthe Russian leader seemed to him as very "pro-Western. I simply presented a certain hypothetical vision, a reference to a debate that took place in the NATO in the mids. Then, under the Clinton administration, there was a debate on whether, and on what terms, Russia could become a member of the Alliance.